« Home | Weekend links. » | Hurrah for the Blackshirts! » | How to destroy the BBC without mentioning Murdoch. » | Rambling about the Naked Rambler. » | Iraq inquiry groundhog day. » | The impossibility of freedom of speech. » | Weekend links. » | The real perplexing issue about the snowstorm coup. » | Here's to you, Mrs Robinson. » | More Islam4UK. » 

Monday, January 18, 2010 

The Tory education class war.

At the weekend Peter Oborne treated us to a treatise on how the Conservatives have put together the most radical program for government since Oliver Cromwell, or words similar to that effect. Cameron is far more prepared for government than Blair ever was, and he'd make Margaret Thatcher look like an, err, Conservative by comparison.

Back here in the real world, when you can put a cigarette paper between Labour and the Conservatives, it's invariably the Tories that have the more stomach-turning ideas, as well as those which are simply wrong-headed, or indeed those that are openly reactionary, somewhat strange for a party that claims to now espouse liberal conservatism, whatever that is. Hence we have the pledge to openly redistribute from the single, engaged and everyone else to the married, those who are truly the most in need. Or as today's launch of the party's education policies showed, somehow managing to be even worse than Labour at reforming our benighted education system.

After all, it really ought to be an open goal. Even after almost 13 years under New Labour, still barely 50% manage to get 5 "good GCSEs", a record so appalling that it can't be stressed often enough. There have been improvements made, although considering the amount of money pumped in it would be incredible if there hadn't been, and diplomas as introduced by Ed Balls with the mixture of vocational and academic work contained within is one of the few reforms which has been a step in the right direction, but on the whole Labour has been too focused on the league tables, the incessant examination of students and the continued reforming of schools purely it's seemed at times for the sake of it, with academies being the obvious example, which in equal measure have failed to raise standards while at the same time imposing the kind of discipline and rigidity which seems to actively sexually arouse certain individuals pining for the corporal punishment and being seen and not heard of their own childhood. Oh, and the lessons in working in call-centres, the kind of aspirational teaching that the Conservatives seemingly want to build on.

When Cameron then immediately decides that the most important thing which will decide whether or not a child succeeds is not their background, the curricula, the type of school or the amount of funding it receives but the person who teaches them, he's on the verge of talking nonsense on stilts, with Chris linking to some research which is in disagreement with that which Cameron quotes. Ignore that for a second though, and just consider Cameron's thought process: because the teacher is so important, only the very finest should be funded. How are we judging whether the teacher will be any good or not? On the basis of err, the university which they received their degree from and on the grade on the paper they received at their graduation. Surely if the type of school isn't important from the start, it also shouldn't matter which university the degree came from? Obviously not.

For a party which has been crying about Labour's piss-poor supposed class war, the thinking behind the proposed education policy is openly elitist, and also openly discriminatory in favour of the middle and upper classes: when only the top 20 colleges are likely to be considered good enough for those applying for the funding scheme and for their student loan to be paid off, colleges which are overwhelmingly populated by former private school students and which most state school applicants are actively discouraged from applying to for that very reason, this is the Tories' very own class war, their prejudices writ large in the same way as they claim Labour's to be. Even then it's contradictory: only a few months back Michael Gove wanted ex-service personnel to be fast-tracked into schools; now only the "best professionals with the best qualifications" need apply.

Others have pointed out that there is no correlation between the degree you get and the ability you have to teach. In fact, as Chris again suggests, the most academically gifted can potentially make things worse for those with lesser ability. I'd go as far to suggest that there are three groups of teachers out there: those that know what they're doing, those that can connect with those they're teaching, and that far rarer group, those that can do both. The exam results you get in your early twenties are no indication of how good you'll be at either of those things.

Not that the contradictions stop there: on discipline the Tories want to hand all the power over to the teachers themselves, ensuring that they can't be overruled by independent panels on exclusions, while at the same time wanting to ensure that schools can be held to account. Except on the former presumably? Alongside this, we have all the usual promises on cutting bureaucracy, on defeating waste, empowering everyone and all, as is likely, under the constraints imposed by cutting the deficit. Missing, as always, is the realisation that the number one thing parents want is a good local school which they can just send their offspring to in the knowledge that they will receive a good education, not the option to set-up a new one if it isn't good enough or they decide it isn't good enough. This however simply won't float when you can instead introduce your own pet projects, or prove to the newspapers that you're going to do something through even further shake-ups. Just letting the current system settle isn't an option when you've got to put your own imprint onto it, and if anything is likely to make things worse, Cameron's prescription is likely to be it.

Labels: , , , , ,

Share |

Perhaps it's not a big deal in the scheme of things, but my main concern about teachers at the moment is the lack of men, particularly at primary school level. Incentivising science graduates would almost certainly even things up a bit - not because science subjects are disproportionately male but because they're not disproportionately female*; incentivising people whose names begin with E would also help, for the same reason. For that reason alone I'm not totally opposed to the Tories' "openly elitist" proposals.

The "less than 50% A-C passes" statistic has a sting in the tail, incidentally - among the underperforming schools are several independent schools which have opted out of GCSEs in favour of the International GCSE. The irony is, of course, that they've opted out precisely on the grounds that GCSEs has been dumbed down so as to get the figures up. My son's school achieves precisely 0% A-C GCSE passes, putting it at the bottom of the local league table.

*I assume. Where I teach, Criminology is 80% female, which an outsider wouldn't expect.

If Cameron's really seeking to recreate the public school experience in the state sector, he needs to hire intelligent, slightly jaded, cricket and rugby obsessives. At my (relatively minor) public school the masters were an veritable mix of eccentrics, many of them Old Boys. Most of them had gone to Oxford, but I suspect the school tie might have had more to do with that than exceptional results.

I also think that this kind of meddling is exactly why some people risk all kinds of financial pressures to get their kids through private school - because they at least have some limited ability to tell the government to do one and take its latest hairbrained scheme with it.

Perhaps we need to realise that the elephant in the room is that degree of independence - the ability to switch pupils to alternative qualifications, selection & streaming, class sizes - which has more to do with the higher scores than the Oxford grads at the front of the class pinging chalk at pupils when they get an answer wrong?

Julia

Post a Comment

About

  • This is septicisle
profile

Links

    blogspot stats
    Subscribe

     Subscribe in a reader

Archives

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates