The party's over.
Unlike a lot of other teenage revolutionaries, I successfully resisted the temptation to join one of the random far-left groupings that still, despite everything, manage to keep themselves going even as the members doubtless inexorably age. It isn't difficult though to still find affection for groups that believe the shrinking proletariat will, despite all the signs to the contrary, eventually become a revolutionary vanguard with the power and means to overthrow the ruling class. Whether a dictatorship of the proletariat will then follow remains to be seen; that's one of those things that modern Trotskyists never manage to agree upon.
Reading Dave Osler's survey of the potential for a far-left breakthrough at the general election is to re-read the annals of socialist sect history over more or less the last 20 years. Without placing the blame at any particular grouping, the failures are obvious: a complete inability to work together when only an alliance could so much as begin to threaten the Labour party, a shocking lack of leadership material, and that which there is tends to be egotistical and controlling beyond belief, an obsession with fighting yesterday's battles while ignoring the changing nature of modern British society, and most importantly of all, thinking that the electorate will connect with you rather than you having to connect with them.
The spectre which once only haunted the socialist left is now hanging over the left as a whole. The left has just failed to take the greatest opportunity to be handed to it in a generation: a crash which many predicted but which it has been unable to take advantage of. Even as governments turned to Keynes, the left's response has been either muted or non-existent. Just when an alternative has been most needed, as those who have never experienced a recession have had to get used to the feeling of being surplus to requirements, the explanation for why this cycle is doomed to repeat has been almost wholly lacking. Left economists may have been those whose advice has been turned to, but no grouping has built upon this to turn it into a critique of where we went wrong and what has to be changed to even limit the effects should it happen again.
Undoubtedly we can put some of the blame upon a Labour party which has never looked so moribund. It seems determined to spend its few remaining days in power, when not sulking about still being lead by Gordon Brown, showing the poverty of thinking which has condemned it to its current position. All it offers now is the chance for you to keep up with the Joneses, the shallowest, most limited vision of aspiration imaginable. This isn't just down to Brown's intellectual inadequacy when he moves off economics, failing to articulate the "good society" which Blair in flashes painted in his famous verb-less speeches. It's a direct result of Labour's obsession with the dead centre, the triangulation which inhibits its every statement.
Who though is waiting for their chance to prove they could do better? Alan Johnson? One of the Miliband brothers? Harriet Harman? Peter Mandelson? Every single one is dedicated to the continuation of the current policies, with slight changes at the edges. This is the biggest problem facing not just Labour, but the left at large: there are no new potential leaders waiting for their opportunity, rather just the same old bunch of either politicos, trade union dinosaurs or uninspiring if competent incumbents.
Take, just as an example, the "Progressive London" conference being held this weekend. Not content with continuing to use the word "progressive" as if it still means something, it's Ken Livingstone also failing to realise that despite all he's done, for which he deserves praise, he's now yesterday's man and ought to put his dreams of returning to the Mayorship behind him. Look at the panel on "the cost of war" and try not to either smash your monitor or throw up on it: what can Galloway, the political editor of the fucking Morning Star, CND and the Stop the War Coalition say which they haven't already and which hasn't already driven away those who once protested? To take one gathering which isn't completely shooting fish in a barrel, there's Stopping the BNP - no concession to the far right, which features such luminaries as that guy out of that band which made that "Heavyweight Champion of the World" song, alongside an union regional secretary and someone from Love Music Hate Racism. When perhaps discussion on why people vote for the BNP should be foremost in the minds of the left, and how to win back supporters that have crossed the political divides, the first people I know I'd turn to would be someone from a good cause which everyone can get behind but which changes nothing and a guy who's made one hit record. There are a couple of promising panels, such as the one on electoral reform and homes and planning for London's future, something which is actually practical, but the rest is the left banging on about the same old things without ever moving forward, which, unless I'm much mistaken, is what progressive is actually meant to mean.
Even if the left and the Labour party separated some time ago, the massive victories of 97 and 2001 resulted in a lengthy period in which minds went unfocused and everyone pretended that much was fine. Since then it has, quite reasonably, focused on foreign affairs but in doing so allowed domestic politics to rot away. The biggest indictment of the left, if over anything, has been the continuing rise of the BNP, and through its refusal, both to even countenance debating the organisation but also in accepting the new orthodoxy that immigration was fine before but it is out of control now and needs to be tackled. The response at this year's European elections to the biggest far-right electoral threat of modern times? To split the vote away from the Greens, with Bob Crow's hopeless and reactionary No2EU organisation and the 80s throwbacks the Socialist Labour Party both on the ballot alongside all the other non-entities. Just when it needed to come together to fight the greater enemy it fractured just as it has in the past.
Where does the left go from here? The best case scenario is that it gets the rude awakening of its life come 6th of May; although a Conservative majority of the size of Labour's first and second terms thankfully seems unlikely, a victory which is large enough to concentrate thinking is the best possible outcome. It doesn't just need to rebuild; it needs to examine whether it has to demolish and start again. The party's over, and whether it starts again depends entirely on the reaction in the coming months. If, as Chris so accurately describes the prospect, of a government run by the children of the rich for the children of the rich doesn't reanimate the corpse of a dying ideological bent, nothing will.
Reading Dave Osler's survey of the potential for a far-left breakthrough at the general election is to re-read the annals of socialist sect history over more or less the last 20 years. Without placing the blame at any particular grouping, the failures are obvious: a complete inability to work together when only an alliance could so much as begin to threaten the Labour party, a shocking lack of leadership material, and that which there is tends to be egotistical and controlling beyond belief, an obsession with fighting yesterday's battles while ignoring the changing nature of modern British society, and most importantly of all, thinking that the electorate will connect with you rather than you having to connect with them.
The spectre which once only haunted the socialist left is now hanging over the left as a whole. The left has just failed to take the greatest opportunity to be handed to it in a generation: a crash which many predicted but which it has been unable to take advantage of. Even as governments turned to Keynes, the left's response has been either muted or non-existent. Just when an alternative has been most needed, as those who have never experienced a recession have had to get used to the feeling of being surplus to requirements, the explanation for why this cycle is doomed to repeat has been almost wholly lacking. Left economists may have been those whose advice has been turned to, but no grouping has built upon this to turn it into a critique of where we went wrong and what has to be changed to even limit the effects should it happen again.
Undoubtedly we can put some of the blame upon a Labour party which has never looked so moribund. It seems determined to spend its few remaining days in power, when not sulking about still being lead by Gordon Brown, showing the poverty of thinking which has condemned it to its current position. All it offers now is the chance for you to keep up with the Joneses, the shallowest, most limited vision of aspiration imaginable. This isn't just down to Brown's intellectual inadequacy when he moves off economics, failing to articulate the "good society" which Blair in flashes painted in his famous verb-less speeches. It's a direct result of Labour's obsession with the dead centre, the triangulation which inhibits its every statement.
Who though is waiting for their chance to prove they could do better? Alan Johnson? One of the Miliband brothers? Harriet Harman? Peter Mandelson? Every single one is dedicated to the continuation of the current policies, with slight changes at the edges. This is the biggest problem facing not just Labour, but the left at large: there are no new potential leaders waiting for their opportunity, rather just the same old bunch of either politicos, trade union dinosaurs or uninspiring if competent incumbents.
Take, just as an example, the "Progressive London" conference being held this weekend. Not content with continuing to use the word "progressive" as if it still means something, it's Ken Livingstone also failing to realise that despite all he's done, for which he deserves praise, he's now yesterday's man and ought to put his dreams of returning to the Mayorship behind him. Look at the panel on "the cost of war" and try not to either smash your monitor or throw up on it: what can Galloway, the political editor of the fucking Morning Star, CND and the Stop the War Coalition say which they haven't already and which hasn't already driven away those who once protested? To take one gathering which isn't completely shooting fish in a barrel, there's Stopping the BNP - no concession to the far right, which features such luminaries as that guy out of that band which made that "Heavyweight Champion of the World" song, alongside an union regional secretary and someone from Love Music Hate Racism. When perhaps discussion on why people vote for the BNP should be foremost in the minds of the left, and how to win back supporters that have crossed the political divides, the first people I know I'd turn to would be someone from a good cause which everyone can get behind but which changes nothing and a guy who's made one hit record. There are a couple of promising panels, such as the one on electoral reform and homes and planning for London's future, something which is actually practical, but the rest is the left banging on about the same old things without ever moving forward, which, unless I'm much mistaken, is what progressive is actually meant to mean.
Even if the left and the Labour party separated some time ago, the massive victories of 97 and 2001 resulted in a lengthy period in which minds went unfocused and everyone pretended that much was fine. Since then it has, quite reasonably, focused on foreign affairs but in doing so allowed domestic politics to rot away. The biggest indictment of the left, if over anything, has been the continuing rise of the BNP, and through its refusal, both to even countenance debating the organisation but also in accepting the new orthodoxy that immigration was fine before but it is out of control now and needs to be tackled. The response at this year's European elections to the biggest far-right electoral threat of modern times? To split the vote away from the Greens, with Bob Crow's hopeless and reactionary No2EU organisation and the 80s throwbacks the Socialist Labour Party both on the ballot alongside all the other non-entities. Just when it needed to come together to fight the greater enemy it fractured just as it has in the past.
Where does the left go from here? The best case scenario is that it gets the rude awakening of its life come 6th of May; although a Conservative majority of the size of Labour's first and second terms thankfully seems unlikely, a victory which is large enough to concentrate thinking is the best possible outcome. It doesn't just need to rebuild; it needs to examine whether it has to demolish and start again. The party's over, and whether it starts again depends entirely on the reaction in the coming months. If, as Chris so accurately describes the prospect, of a government run by the children of the rich for the children of the rich doesn't reanimate the corpse of a dying ideological bent, nothing will.
Labels: death of Labour, our new overlords, politics, the far left, the new Tories, where do we go from here
| Permalink
That, for my money, is Obsolete at its very best. A cracking piece of analysis. Thanks.
But (as usual) one itsy-bitsy thing - or rather the unacknowledged elephant in the room:
IMHO, the terms 'Left' and 'Right', implying a spectrum of political possibilities and policy, have for all practical purposes become meaningless other than at the shallowest of levels needed to provide the 'Proletariat' with an illusion of political influence - and to exhaust any political energy they can summon with trivia. What passes for 'The Left' and that other redundant category 'Progressive', have long since been co-opted to the purposes of REAL power in the Western world which correlates close to perfection with Wealth and the control of capital.
The only political imperative worthy of the name 'progressive' in the opening decades of the 21st century ought to take aim squarely and single-mindedly at breaking that correlation. It is the sine qua non of anything and everything that the old left used to dream about.
IMO the Labour Party is finished other than as Tweedledum to the Tory Party Tweedledee for so long as that bloody great elephant remains unacknowledged and is allowed to shit and rampage all over the place at will.
OTOH, the shit storm approaching over the convergences of peak just-about-everything is likely to shatter our self-satisfied illusions of perenial linear Western-led progress to Valhalla, such that this sort of debate is rendered totally meaningless. You will probably be witness to it. I OTOH will be (or rather am) witness merely to its prelude.
What a boring old fart I am eh?
Posted by
Sabretache |
Friday, January 29, 2010 9:56:00 am
Oh, I quite agree. Left and right (not to even mention progressive) have become meaningless because those parties that previously aligned and marketed themselves as such have since abandoned those very defining lines. Another part of the challenge to what remains of the left is to make it mean something again; hence why I think a Green-Left alliance is essential also in line with your final thought.
Posted by
septicisle |
Friday, January 29, 2010 2:09:00 pm
Thoroughly depressing. What I will say is that it was a long time after 1929 before the left benefited. (And I think there's still a long way to go before this economic crisis is over).
I'll also say that at least the right aren't doing much better. Sure, the Tories look like they'll be in next, but it's not been through moving the public rightwards. On the economy, while reacting negatively to Keynesian policies, they have been more populist on reform of capitalism (whether or not they mean it). And it comes to something when their most socially corrosive policy is a silly little tax cut for married couples. Socialism is dead, but so is social conservatism, at least as a movement.
I disagree though, that the left will find salvation through the environmental movement. Sure, those policies are generally good policies to have, but there's not many votes in them.
I think the rejuvenation of the left will have to come through the civil liberties movement. I can see the outcry against New Labour's War on Terror policies. And I don't see the Tories doing much to turn those policies around. I also see the Iraq war inquiry showing how unaccountable the political process is. As more and more people turn away from the MSM and towards the new media on the internet, will there be a tipping point on the civil liberties front?
A man can dream.
Posted by
Oriel boy |
Friday, January 29, 2010 10:57:00 pm
While it's clear that the 'organised left' in the form of political party structures are now falling upon themselves in the last flourish of self destruction, I wonder if you are being a little too pessimistic for the 'left ideology'.
One aspect that has not left us is the desire for 'redistributive socialism'. So many people are now entirely dependent on state aid for their current existance that such a large number of people cannot fail to find a coherrent voice to represent them for any meaningful length of time.
It will only take a small shift away from the redistributive policies now operative to cause an awful amount of people to pine for a true government of the left. Add that number to the truly 'ideological left', and that number will result in a coming together of the factions and cohesive leadership. The opportunity to defeat the Conservatives will prove too tempting for the infighting to continue long, that was Blair's legacy.
Posted by
Tony_E |
Saturday, January 30, 2010 10:07:00 am
I agree. Excellent analysis. Fractionalism on the left has, and im afraid always will be, its own burden.
Also, one day it will be acknoweldged how devastating Tony Blair (a PM that was to the right of at least half the Tory party) has been for the whole left. He may have won 3 elections, but the long-term damage we've just started to appreciate.
Posted by
claude |
Monday, February 01, 2010 2:53:00 pm
As a journalist at the Morning Star I can exclusively reveal that "the fucking Morning Star" is a myth.
Our daily newspaper (as opposed to Murdoch et al) has remained relatively chaste in preparation for a dalliance with a less-than-shit future. So keep your porno fantasies to yourself, Septic!
Posted by
Unknown |
Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:58:00 am
Post a Comment